Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing alternative futures for agriculture in Iowa, U.S.A.

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contributions of current agricultural practices to environmental degradation and the social problems facing agricultural regions are well known. However, landscape-scale alternatives to current trends have not been fully explored nor their potential impacts quantified. To address this research need, our interdisciplinary team designed three alternative future scenarios for two watersheds in Iowa, USA, and used spatially-explicit models to evaluate the potential consequences of changes in farmland management. This paper summarizes and integrates the results of this interdisciplinary research project into an assessment of the designed alternatives intended to improve our understanding of landscape ecology in agricultural ecosystems and to inform agricultural policy. Scenario futures were digitized into a Geographic Information System (GIS), visualized with maps and simulated images, and evaluated for multiple endpoints to assess impacts of land use change on water quality, social and economic goals, and native flora and fauna. The Biodiversity scenario, targeting restoration of indigenous biodiversity, ranked higher than the current landscape for all endpoints (biodiversity, water quality, farmer preference, and profitability). The Biodiversity scenario ranked higher than the Production scenario (which focused on profitable agricultural production) in all endpoints but profitability, for which the two scenarios scored similarly, and also ranked higher than the Water Quality scenario in all endpoints except water quality. The Water Quality scenario, which targeted improvement in water quality, ranked highest of all landscapes in potential water quality and higher than the current landscape and the Production scenario in all but profitability. Our results indicate that innovative agricultural practices targeting environmental improvements may be acceptable to farmers and could substantially reduce the environmental impacts of agriculture in this region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern J. 1999. Spatial Concepts, Planning Strategies and Future Scenarios: A Framework Method for Integrating Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning. In: Klopatek J.M. and Gardner R.H. (eds), Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA, pp. 175–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander R.B., Smith R. and Schwartz G. 1996. The Regional Transport of Point and Nonpoint-Source Nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Proceedings of the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Management Conference, December 5–6, 1995, Kenner, Louisiana, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, March 5, 1996.

  • Arcury T.A. 1990. Environmental Attitude and Environmental Knowledge. Human Organization. 49(4): 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J.G., Williams J. and Maidment D.R. 1997. Continuous time water and sediment routing model for large basins. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 121: 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker J.P., Hulse D.W., Gregory S.V., White D., Van Sickle J., Berger P.A., Dole D. and Schumaker N.H. 2004. Alternative futures for the Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Ecological Applications. In press.

  • Becher K.D., Schnoebelen D.J. and Ackers K.B. 2000. Nutrients discharged to the Mississippi River from eastern Iowa watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36: 161–173.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bender D. J., Contreras T.A. and Fahrig L. 1998. Habitat loss and population decline: a meta-analysis of the patch-size effect. Ecology 79: 517–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake J.G. and Karr J.R. 1987. Breeding birds of isolated woodlots: area and habitat relationships. Ecology 68: 1724–1734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coiner C., Wu J. and Polasky S. 2001. Economic and environmental implications of alternative landscape designs in the Walnut Creek watershed of Iowa. Ecological Economics 38: 119–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinge S.K. 1996. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 36: 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning J.B., Stewart D.J., Danielson B.J., Noon B.R., Root T.L., Lamberson R.H. and Stevens E.F. 1995. Spatially-explicit population models: current forms and future uses. Ecological Applications 5: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré C. and Ehrlen J. 2002. Habitat configuration, species traits and plant distributions. Journal of Ecology 90: 796–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilers L.J. and Roosa D.M. 1994. The Vascular Plants of Iowa. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar D. 1981. Perspectives on Iowa’s declining flora and fauna-A symposium. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science 88: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemark K. 1995. Assessing effects of agriculture on terrestrial wildlife: developing a hierarchical approach for the U.S. EPA. Landscape and Urban Planning 31: 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemark K. and Smith J. 1995. A landscape retrospective for Walnut Creek, Story County. Technical report to the U.S. EPA. Unpublished contract report.

  • Hatfield J.L., Jaynes D.B., Burkart M.R., Cambardella C.A., Mooreman T.B., Prueger J.H., Smith M.A. 1999. Water Quality in Walnut Creek Watershed: Setting and Farming Practices. Journal of Environmental Quality 28: 11–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klopatek J.M., Olson R.J., Emerson C.J. and Joness J.L. 1979. Land-use conflicts with natural vegetation in the United States. Environmental Conservation 6: 191–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs J.R., Wilson J.D., Bradbury R.B. and Siriwardena G.M. 1999. A second Silent Spring? Nature 400: 611–612.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamy F., Bolte J., Santelmann M. and Smith C. 2002. Development and evaluation of multiple-objective decision-making methods for watershed management planning. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38: 517–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R. 1966. The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist 54: 421–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens G.E., Bormann F.H., Pierce R.S., Eaton J.S. and Johnson N.M. 1977. Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson P.A., Parton W.J., Power A.G. and Swift M.J. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277: 504–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch W.J., Day J.W. Jr., Gilliam J.W., Groffman P.M., Hey D.L., Randall G.W. and Wang N. 2001. Reducing nitrogen loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin: Strategies to counter a persistent ecological problem. Bioscience 51: 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • index.html. Accessed 06/25/2003.

  • Nassauer J.I., Corry R.C. and Cruse R. 2002. The landscape in 2025:Alternative landscape future scenarios as a means to consider agricultural policy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 57(2): 44A–53A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer J. I. and Corry R.C. 2004. Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 19: this issue.

  • Peterson G., Cumming A., Carpenter S. 2003. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology 17(2): 358–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey R.L., Humphries C.J., Margules C.R., Vane-Right R.I. and Williams P.H. 1993. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 124–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior J. 1991. Landforms of Iowa. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puckett L.J. 1994. Nonpoint and point sources of nitrogen in major watersheds of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigations Report 94-4001, USGS Washington DC, USA.

  • Rabb G.B. and Sullivan T.B. 1995. Coordinating conservation: global networking for species survival. Conservation and Biodiversity 4: 536–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson C.A., Cruse R.M. and Ghaffarzadeh M. 1996. Cropping system and nitrogen effects on mollison organic carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60: 264–269.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M.L. 1997. Heeding the warning in biodiversity’s basic law. Science 284: 276–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustigian H. 1999. Assessing the potential impacts of alternative landscape designs on amphibian population dynamics. Master of Science Research Paper, Department of Geosciences, Geography Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustigian H., Santelmann M. and Schumaker N. 2003. Assessing the potential impacts of alternative landscape designs on amphibian population dynamics. Landscape Ecology 18: 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala O.E., Stuart Chapin III F., Armesto J.J., Berlow E., Bloom-field J., Dirzo R., Huber-Sanwald E., Huenneke L., Jackson R.B., Kinzig A., Leemans R., Dodge D.M., Mooney H.A., Oesterheld M., Poff N.L., Sykes M.T., Walker B.H., Walker M. and Wall D.H. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–1774.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santelmann M., Freemark K., White D., Nassauer J., Clark M., Danielson B., Eilers J., Cruse R., Galatowitsch S., Polasky S., Vaché K., Wu J. 2001. Applying Ecological Principles to Land-Use Decision Making in Agricultural Watersheds. In: Dale V. and Haeuber R. (eds), Applying Ecological Principles to Land Management. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling K.E. and Thompson C.A. 2000. Walnut Creek monitoring project, Iowa: Monitoring water quality in response to prairie restoration. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 36: 1101–1114.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoup M. 1999. Agricultural Runoff of Nutrients and Indicator Organisms in Buck Creek, Iowa. Masters of Science Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starfield A. 1997. A pragmatic approach to modeling for wildlife management. Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 261–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz C., Arias H., Bassett S., Flaxman M., Goode T., Maddock III T., Mouat D., Peiser R. and Shearer A.. 2003. Alternative futures for changing landscapes: The Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora. Island Press, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tress B. and Tress G.. 2003. Scenario visualization for participatory landscape planning-a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning 64: 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau. 2001. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2001. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • US GAO. 1999. Report on Animal Agriculture:Waste Management Practices. U.S. General Accounting Office Report GAO/RCED-99-205.

  • US OTA. 1995. Targeting environmental priorities in agriculture: Reforming program strategies. Congress of the United States, Office of Technology Assessment. OTA-ENV-640. Government Printing Office, Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS-GAP. 2003. http://www.gap.uidaho.edu/ Accessed September 23, 2003.

  • USDA-NASS. 1999. Farms and Land in Farms 1993–1997, U. S. Department of Agriculture Statistical Bulletin 955.

  • USDA-NRCS. 1996. A Geography of Hope, USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. 80 pp.

  • USDA-NRCS. 1997. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. Accessed September 12, 1997.

  • Vaché K., Eilers J. and Santelmann M.V. 2002. Water Quality Modeling for Evaluation of Alternative Agricultural Practices in Two Iowa Watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38: 773–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P.M., Mooney H.A., Lubchenco J., Melillo J.M.. 1997a. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P.M., Aber J.D., Howarth R.W., Likens G.E., Matson P.A., Schindler D.W., Schlesinger W.H., Tilman D.G. 1997b. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7: 737–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • White D., Minotti P.G., Barczak M.J., Sifneos J.C., Freemark K.E., Santelmann M., Steinitz C.F., Keister A.R. and Preston E.M. 1997. Assessing risks to biodiversity from future landscape change. Conservation Biology 11: 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White D., Preston E.M., Freemark K.E. and Kiester A.R.. 1999. A hierarchical framework for conserving biodiversity. In: Klopatek J.M. and Gardner R.H. (eds), Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications. Springer, New York, New York, USA, pp. 127–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams J.R., Jones C.A. and Dyke P.T. 1988. EPIC, the Erosion Productivity Index Calculator, Model Documentation Vol. 1 USDA ARS, Temple, Texas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.V. Santelmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santelmann, M., White, D., Freemark, K. et al. Assessing alternative futures for agriculture in Iowa, U.S.A.. Landscape Ecol 19, 357–374 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030459.43445.19

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030459.43445.19

Navigation