Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

The self-reinforcing feedback between low soil fertility and chronic poverty

Nature Geoscience volume 8, pages 907–912 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Most of the world's extreme poor, surviving on US$1.25 or less per day, live in rural areas and farm for a living. Many suffer chronic poverty that lasts for years or generations, rather than the transitory poverty that dominates developed, urban economies. Such chronic, structural poverty arises when an individual's productive assets — such as their ability to work or their soils — and the technologies and markets that transform their assets into food and income are insufficient to attain satisfactory living standards. Research reveals strong links between economic status and soil quality, and these can be self-reinforcing. For example, poor soil constrains agricultural production and household capital, and low household capital constrains investments in improving soils. Price, availability and access to credit can limit farmers' applications of nutrients, which are often the primary constraint on agricultural productivity. Soil micronutrient deficiencies can lead to dietary mineral deficiencies and negative health outcomes that further constrain productivity and household asset accumulation. Soils may also be important for smallholder resilience to stressors and shocks. For example, high-quality soil can reduce vulnerability to drought, and insurance against risk may promote investment in soils. Interventions such as fertilizer subsidies, micronutrient-fortified fertilizer and improved access to information, insurance and credit may all help break the soil–poverty cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Soil nutrient flows are positively correlated with per-capita income in sub-Saharan Africa, for both 1983 and 2002–2004.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development (World Bank, 2008).

  2. Barrett, C. B. & Carter, M. R. The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: empirical and policy implications. J. Dev. Stud. 49, 976–990 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Azariadis, C. & Stachurski, J. in Handbook of Economic Growth (eds Aghion, P. & Durlauf, S.) 295–384 (Elsevier, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carter, M. R. & Barrett, C. B. The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: an asset-based approach. J. Dev. Stud. 42, 178–199 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dasgupta, P. Nutritional status, the capacity for work and poverty traps. J. Econometrics 77, 5–37 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Antle, J. M., Stoorvogel, J. J., Valdivia, R. O. Multiple equilibria, soil conservation, and the resilience of agricultural system. Environ. Dev. Econ. 11, 477–492 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett, C. B. in Economics of Poverty, the Environment and Natural Resource Use (eds Ruis, A. & Dellink, R.) Ch. 2, 17–40 (Springer, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stephens, E. C. et al. Modeling the impact of natural resource-based poverty traps on food security in Kenya: the crops, livestock and soils in smallholder economic systems (CLASSES) model. Food Sec. 4, 423–439 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tittonell, P. & Giller, K. E. When yield gaps are poverty traps: the paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Res. 143, 76–90 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krishna, A. et al. Escaping poverty and becoming poor in 36 villages of central and western Uganda. J. Dev. Stud. 42, 346–370 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barrett, C. B. et al. Welfare dynamics in rural Kenya and Madagascar. J. Dev. Stud. 42, 248–277 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morris, M. L., Kelly, V. A., Kopicki, R. J. & Byerlee, D. Fertilizer use in African agriculture: lessons learned and good practice guidelines (World Bank, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ravallion, M. How long will it take to lift one billion people out of poverty?” World Bank Res. Obser. 28, 139–158 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. IFDC Report 31 (International Fertilizer Development Center, 2006).

  15. On first World Soil Day, Secretary-General says in message, sustainable management should be universal priority, as healthy planet requires healthy soils. United Nations Press Release (3 December 2014); http://www.un.org/press/en/2014/sgsm16388.doc.htm

  16. Marenya, P. P. & Barrett, C. B. Soil quality and fertilizer use rates among smallholder farmers in western Kenya. Agr. Econ. 40, 561–572 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marenya, P. P. & Barrett, C. B. State-conditional fertilizer yield response on Western Kenyan Farms. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 91, 991–1006 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amsalu, A. & Graaff, J. D. Determinants of adoption and continued use of stone terraces for soil and water conservation in an Ethiopian highland watershed. Ecol. Econ. 61, 294–302 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lal, R. Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degr. Dev. 17, 197–209 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sanchez, P. A. & Swaminathan, M. S. Hunger in Africa: the link between unhealthy people and unhealthy soils. Lancet 365, 442–444 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carter, M. R., Laajaj, R. & Yang, D. The impact of voucher coupons on the uptake of fertilizer and improved seeds: evidence from a randomized trial in Mozambique. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 95, 1345–1351 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zingore, S., Murwira, H. K., Delve, R. J. & Giller, K. E. Influence of nutrient management strategies on variability of soil fertility, crop yields and nutrient balances on smallholder farms in Zimbabwe. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 119, 112–126 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Suri, T. Selection and comparative advantage in technology adoption. Econometrica 79, 159–209 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Beaman, L., Karlan, D., Thuysbaert, B. & Udry, C. Self-Selection into Credit Markets: Evidence from Agriculture in Mali Report No. w20387 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shepherd, K. D. & Soule, M. J. Soil fertility management in west Kenya: dynamic simulation of productivity, profitability and sustainability at different resource endowment levels. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 71, 131–145 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mbaga-Semgalawe, Z. & Folmer, H. Household adoption behaviour of improved soil conservation: the case of the North Pare and West Usambara Mountains of Tanzania. Land Use Policy 17, 321–336 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shively, G. E. Poverty, consumption risk, and soil conservation. J. Dev. Econ. 65, 267–290 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dramadri, J., Hyuha, T. S. & Mugisha, J. Determinants of demand for purchased fertilizers in Mbale district in Uganda. Proc. Afr. Crop Sci. Conf. 7 771–774 (2005).

  29. Marenya, P. P. & Barrett, C. B. Household-level determinants of adoption of improved natural resources management practices among smallholder farmers in western Kenya. Food Policy 32, 515–536 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rowe, E. C., Van Wijk, M. T., De Ridder, N. & Giller, K. E. Nutrient allocation strategies across a simplified heterogeneous African smallholder farm. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 116, 60–71 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zingore, S., Murwira, H. K., Delve, R. J. & Giller, K. E. Variable grain legume yields, responses to phosphorus and rotational effects on maize across soil fertility gradients on African smallholder farms. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 80, 1–18 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zingore, S., Delve, R. J., Nyamangara, J. & Giller, K. E. Multiple benefits of manure: the key to maintenance of soil fertility and restoration of depleted sandy soils on African smallholder farms. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 80, 267–282 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rosenzweig, M. & Udry, C. Forecasting profitability. Working Paper 19334 (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vanlauwe, B., Tittonell, P. & Mukulama, J. Within-farm soil fertility gradients affect response of maize to fertiliser application in western Kenya. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 76, 171–182 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jama, B., Buresh, R. J. & Place, F. M. Sesbania tree fallows on phosphorus-deficient sites: maize yield and financial benefit. Agron. J. 90, 717–726 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Beaman, L., Karlan, D., Thuysbaert, B. & Udry, C. Profitability of fertilizer: experimental evidence from female rice farmers in Mali. Am. Econ. Rev. 103, 381–386 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bayala, J. et al. Cereal yield response to conservation agriculture practices in drylands of West Africa: a quantitative synthesis. J. Arid Environ. 78, 13–25 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shiferaw, B. & Holden, S. T. Farm-level benefits to investments for mitigating land degradation: empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Environ. Dev. Econ. 6, 335–358 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bekele, W. & Drake, L. Soil and water conservation decision behavior of subsistence farmers in the Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia: a case study of the Hunde-Lafto area. Ecol. Econ. 46, 437–451 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yirga, C. & Hassan, R. M. Poverty and soil conservation efforts among smallholder farmers in the central highlands of Ethiopia: economics. South Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 9, 244–261 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gebremedhin, B. & Swinton, S. M. Investment in soil conservation in northern Ethiopia: the role of land tenure security and public programs. Agr. Econ. 29, 69–84 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kristjanson, P., Mango, N., Krishna, A., Radeny, M. & Johnson, N. Understanding poverty dynamics in Kenya. J. Intl Dev. 22, 978–996 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Boserup, E. The Condition of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure (Allan and Urwin, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jalan, J. & Ravallion, M. Geographic poverty traps? A micro model of consumption growth in rural China. J. Appl. Econometrics 17, 329–346 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D. & Sevilla, J. Geography and poverty traps. J. Econ. Growth 8, 355–378 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mwangi, W. M. Low use of fertilizers and low productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 47, 135–147 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Benson, T., Lubega, P., Bayite-Kasule, S., Mogues, T. & Nyachwo, J. The supply of inorganic fertilizers to smallholder farmers in Uganda: evidence for fertilizer policy development Discussion Paper 01228 (International Food Policy Research Institute, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Barrett, C. B. Food marketing liberalization and trader entry: evidence from Madagascar. World Dev. 25, 763–777 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Osborne, T. Imperfect competition in agricultural markets: evidence from Ethiopia. J. Dev. Econ. 76, 405–428 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mérel, P. R., Sexton, R. J. & Suzuki, A. Optimal investment in transportation infrastructure when middlemen have market power: a developing-country analysis. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 91, 462–476 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Moser, C., Barrett, C. & Minten, B. Spatial integration at multiple scales: rice markets in Madagascar. Agr. Econ. 40, 281–294 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Barrows, R. & Roth, M. Land tenure and investment in African agriculture: theory and evidence. J. Mod. Afr. Stud. 28, 265–297 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Deininger, K. & Jin, S. Tenure security and land-related investment: evidence from Ethiopia. Eur. Econ. Rev. 50, 1245–1277 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Barrett, C. B. & Swallow, B. M. Fractal poverty traps. World Dev. 34, 1–15 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Maluccio, J. A. et al. The impact of improving nutrition during early childhood on education among Guatemalan adults. Econ. J. 119, 734–763 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Allaway, W. H. in Trace Elements in Human and Animals Nutrition 5th edn (ed. Mertz, W.) 465–488 (Academic, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Barrett, C. B. & Bevis, L. E. M. in The Fight Against Hunger and Malnutrition: The Role of Food, Agriculture, and Targeted Policies. (ed. Sahn, D. E.) Ch. 3, 61–88 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bevis, L. E. M. Soil-to-human mineral transmission with an emphasis on zinc, selenium, and iodine. Springer Sci. Rev. 3, 77–96 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fuge, R. in Essentials of Medical Geology (eds Centeno, J. A., Finkelman, R. B., Fuge, R., Lindh, U. & Smedley, P) 417–432 (Springer, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  60. McDowell, L. R. Minerals in Animals and Human Nutrition. 2nd edn (Elsevier, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ren, Q., Fan, J., Zhang, Z., Zheng, X. & DeLong, G. R. An environmental approach to correcting iodine deficiency: supplementing iodine in soil by iodination of irrigation water in remote areas. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 22, 1–8 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Cao, X. Y. et al. Iodination of irrigation water as a method of supplying iodine to a severely iodine-deficient population in Xinjiang, China. Lancet 344, 107–110 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hartikainen, H. Biogeochemistry of selenium and its impact on food chain quality and human health. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 18, 309–318 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kantola, M., Vartiainen, T. Changes in selenium, zinc, copper, and cadmium contents in human milk during the time when selenium has been supplemented to fertilizers in Finland. J. Trace Elem. Med. Bio. 15, 11–17 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  65. McGlashan, N. D. Low selenium status and cot deaths. Med. Hypotheses 35, 311–314 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rayman, M. P. The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet 356, 233–241 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Harthill, M. Review: micronutrient selenium deficiency influences evolution of some viral infectious diseases. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 143, 1325–1336 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Lee, K. H. & Jeong, D. Bimodal actions of selenium essential for antioxidant and toxic pro-oxidant activities: the selenium paradox. Mol. Med. Rep. 5, 299–304 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Singh, M. V. Micronutrient nutritional problems in soils of India and improvement for human and animal health. Indian J. Fert. 5, 11–16 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Alloway, B. Zinc in Soils and Crop Nutrition 2nd edn (International Zinc Association and International Fertilizer Industry Association, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Prasad, A. S. Zinc is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent: its role in human health. Front. Nutrition 1, 14 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mayer, A. M. B., Latham, M. C., Duxbury, J. M., Hassan, N., Frongillo, E. A. A food-based approach to improving zinc nutrition through increasing the zinc content of rice in Bangladesh. J. Hunger Environ. Nutr. 2, 19–39 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Chilimba, A. D. et al. Maize grain and soil surveys reveal suboptimal dietary selenium intake is widespread in Malawi. Scientific Reports 1, 72 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Barrett, C. B. Smallholder market participation: concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa. Food Policy 33, 299–317 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Tidemann-Andersen, I., Acham, H., Maage, A. & Malde, M. K. Iron and zinc content of selected foods in the diet of school children in Kumi district, East of Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Nutr. J. 10, 81–93 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Hirvonen, K. & Hoddinott, J. Agricultural production and children's diets: Evidence from rural Ethiopia Working Paper 69 (International Food Policy Research Institute, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Graham, R. D., Knez, M. & Welch. R. M. How much nutritional iron deficiency in humans globally is due to an underlying zinc deficiency? Adv. Agron. 115, 1–40 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Bouis, H. E. & Welch, R. M. Biofortification—a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Sci. 50, S20–S32 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Black, R. E., Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 371, 243–260 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  80. The Global Burden of Disease: Generating Evidence, Guiding Policy (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2013).

  81. Prasad, A. S. Zinc deficiency has been known of for 40 years but ignored by global health organizations. Brit. Med. J. 326, 409–410 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Hotz, C. & Brown, K. H. Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations and options for its control. Food Nutr. Bull. 25, S91–204 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Hetzel, B. S. & Wellby, M. L. in Handbook of Nutritionally Essential Mineral Elements (eds O'Dell, B. L. & Sunde, R. A.) 557–582 (Marcel Dekker, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Mistry, H. D., Pipkin, F., Redman, C. & Posten, L. Selenium in reproductive health. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 206, 21–30 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Hoddinott, J., Maluccio, J. A., Behrman, J. R., Flores, R. & Martorell, R. Effect of a nutrition intervention during early childhood on economic productivity in Guatemalan adults. Lancet 371, 411–416 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Rosenzweig, M. R. & Binswanger, H. P. Wealth, weather risk, and the composition and profitability of agricultural investments. Econ. J. 103, 56–78 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Barrett, C. B. & Constas, M. A. Toward a theory of resilience for international development applications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14625–14630 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Parker, C. Observations on the current status of Orobanche and Striga problems worldwide. Pest Manag. Sci. 65, 453–459 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Ayongwa, G. C., Stomph, T. J. & Kuyper, T. W. Host-parasite dynamics of Sorghum bicolor and Striga hermonthica — the influence of soil organic matter amendments of different C:N ratio. Crop Prot. 30, 1613–1622 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Garrity, D. P. et al. Evergreen agriculture: a robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa. Food Sec. 2, 197–214 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Abbas, H. K. et al. Ecology of Aspergillus flavus, regulation of aflatoxin production, and management strategies to reduce aflatoxin contamination of corn. Toxin Rev. 28, 142–153 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Zablotowicz, R. M., Abbas, H. K. & Locke, M. A. Population ecology of Aspergillus flavus associated with Mississippi Delta soils. Food Addit. Contam. 24, 1102–1108 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Dercon, S. & Christiaensen, L. Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps: Evidence from Ethiopia. J. Dev. Econ. 96, 159–173 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  94. McIntosh, C., Sarris, A. & Papadopoulos, F. Productivity, credit, risk, and the demand for weather index insurance in smallholder agriculture in Ethiopia. Agr. Econ. 44, 399–417 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Vanlauwe, B. et al. Integrated soil fertility management: operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Outlook Agr. 39, 17–24 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Druilhe, Z., Barreiro-Hurlé, J. Fertilizer subsidies in sub-Saharan Africa. ESA Working Paper No. 12–04 (FOA, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Holden, S. & Lunduka, R. Do fertilizer subsidies crowd out organic manures? The case of Malawi. Agr. Econ. 43, 303–314 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Stoorvogel, J. J., Smaling, E. M. A. Assessment of soil nutrient depletion in Sub-Saharan Africa: 1983–2000 (Vol. 1). Report 28 (Winand Staring Centre, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Henao, J. & Baanante, C. Agricultural production and soil nutrient mining in Africa: implications for resource conservation and policy development (International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Julia Berazneva, Ken Giller, Teevrat Garg, Chris Golden, Stein Holden, Johannes Lehmann, Linden McBride, Pedro Sanchez, Ross Welch, Meghan Sheahan, Rachel Hestrin and Bernard Vanlauwe each offered helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, 14850, New York, USA

    Christopher B. Barrett & Leah E. M. Bevis

Authors
  1. Christopher B. Barrett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leah E. M. Bevis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors conceived of and designed the research, and drafted, reviewed, edited and revised the manuscript. L.E.M.B. performed data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher B. Barrett.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barrett, C., Bevis, L. The self-reinforcing feedback between low soil fertility and chronic poverty. Nature Geosci 8, 907–912 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2591

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2591

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing