Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:26:53.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Infiltration and adsorption of dissolved metolachlor, metolachlor oxanilic acid, and metolachlor ethanesulfonic acid by buffalograss (Buchloe dactyloides) filter strips

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Scott A. Senseman
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2474
Monty C. Dozier
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas Cooperative Extension, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843
Dennis W. Hoffman
Affiliation:
Blackland Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Temple, TX 76502
Dennis P. Tierney
Affiliation:
Environmental Stewardship and Regulatory Policy, Syngenta Crop Protection, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419-8300

Abstract

Vegetative filter strips (VFS) potentially reduce herbicide transport from agricultural fields by increasing herbicide mass infiltrated (Minf) and herbicide mass adsorbed (Mas) compared with bare field soil. However, there are conflicting reports in the literature concerning the contribution of Mas to herbicide trapping efficiency (TE). Moreover, no study has evaluated TE among metolachlor and metolachlor metabolites in a VFS. This experiment was conducted to compare TE, Minf, and Mas among metolachlor, metolachlor oxanilic acid (OA), and metolachlor ethanesulfonic acid (ESA) in buffalograss filter strips. Runoff was applied as a point source upslope of a 1- × 3-m microwatershed at a rate of 750 L h−1. The point source was fortified with metolachlor, metolachlor OA, and metolachlor ESA, each at 0.12 μg ml−1. After moving through the plot, water samples were collected at 5-min intervals and stored at 5 C until analysis. Water samples were extracted using solid-phase extraction and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography–photodiode array detection. TE was significantly greater for metolachlor (25.3%) as compared with the OA (15.5%) and ESA metabolites (14.2%). The average Minf was 8.5% and was not significantly different among compounds. Significantly more metolachlor (17.3%) was retained as Mas compared with either metolachlor OA (7.0%) or metolachlor ESA (5.5%). Moreover, Mas accounted for 68 and 42% of the total TE for metolachlor and metolachlor metabolites, respectively. These results demonstrate that adsorption to the VFS grass, grass thatch, or soil surface (or all) is an important retention mechanism for metolachlor and metolachlor metabolites, especially under saturated conditions. Moreover, the Mas data indicate that metolachlor is preferentially retained by the VFS grass, grass thatch, or soil surface (or all) compared with the OA and ESA metabolites. Greater metolachlor retention in VFS compared with the OA and ESA metabolites may partially explain why metolachlor metabolites are frequently measured at higher concentrations than metolachlor is in surface water.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aga, D. S. and Thurman, E. M. 2001. Formation and transport of the sulfonic acid metabolites of alachlor and metolachlor in soil. Environ. Sci. Technol 35:24552460.Google Scholar
Aga, D. S., Thurman, E. M., Yockel, M. E., Zimmerman, L. R., and Williams, T. D. 1996. Identification of a new sulfonic acid metabolite of metolachlor in soil. Environ. Sci. Technol 30:592597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, L. E., Bollen, W. B., and Moodie, C. D. 1965. Total carbon. Pages 13531361 in Black, C. A. ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Agronomy. Volume 9.Google Scholar
Arora, K., Mickelson, S. K., Baker, J. L., Tierney, D. P., and Peters, C. J. 1996. Herbicide retention by vegetative buffer strips from runoff under natural rainfall. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng 39:21552162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmussen, L. E., White, A. W. Jr., Hauser, E. W., and Sheridan, J. M. 1977. Reduction of 2,4-D load in surface runoff down a grassed waterway. J. Environ. Qual 6:159162.Google Scholar
Barfield, B. J., Blevins, R. L., Fogle, A. W., Madison, C. E., Inamdar, S., Carey, D. I., and Evangelou, V. P. 1998. Water quality impacts of natural filter strips in karst areas. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng 41:371381.Google Scholar
Bouyoucos, G. J. 1953. An improved type of soil hydrometer. Soil Sci 76:377378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, J. A., Whitwell, T., and Riley, M. B. 1999. Remediation of herbicides in runoff water from container plant nurseries utilizing grassed waterways. Weed Technol 13:157164.Google Scholar
Dremanis, A. 1962. Quantitative gasometric determination of calcite and dolomite by using the Chittick apparatus. J. Sedimentary Petrol 32:520529.Google Scholar
Field, J. A. and Thurman, E. M. 1996. Glutathione conjugation and contaminant transformation. Environ. Sci. Tech 30:14131418.Google Scholar
Hostetler, K. A. and Thurman, E. M. 2000. Determination of chloroacetanilide herbicide metabolites in water using high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection and high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Sci. Total Environ 248:147155.Google Scholar
Kim, J. H. and Feagley, S. E. 2002. Runoff of trifluralin, metolachlor, and metribuzin from a clay loam soil of Louisiana. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 37:405415.Google Scholar
Kloppel, H., Kordel, W., and Stein, B. 1997. Herbicide transport by surface runoff and herbicide retention in a filter strip—rainfall and runoff simulation studies. Chemosphere 35:129141.Google Scholar
Kolpin, D. W., Thurman, E. M., and Goolsby, D. A. 1996. Occurrence of selected pesticides and their metabolites in near-surface aquifers of the midwestern United States. Environ. Sci. Technol 30:335340.Google Scholar
Kolpin, D. W., Thurman, E. M., and Linhart, S. M. 2000. Finding minimal herbicide concentrations in ground water? Try looking for their degradates. Sci. Total Environ 248:115122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krutz, L. J., Senseman, S. A., Dozier, M. C., Hoffman, D. W., and Tierney, D. P. 2003. Infiltration and adsorption of dissolved atrazine and atrazine metabolites in buffalograss filter strips. J. Environ. Qual 32:23192324.Google Scholar
Lambropoulou, D. A., Sakkas, V. A., Hela, D. G., and Albanis, T. A. 2002. Application of solid-phase microextraction in the monitoring of priority pesticides in the Kalmas river (N. W. Greece). J. Chromatogr. A 963:107116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerch, R. N., Blanchard, P. E., and Thurman, E. M. 1998. Contribution of hydroxylated atrazine degradation products to the total atrazine load in Midwestern streams. Environ. Sci. Technol 32:4048.Google Scholar
Lowrance, R., Vellidis, G., Wauchope, R. D., Gay, P., and Bosch, D. D. 1997. Herbicide transport in a managed riparian forest buffer system. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng 40:10471057.Google Scholar
Mersie, W., Seybold, C. A., McNamee, C., and Huang, J. 1999. Effectiveness of switchgrass filter strips in removing dissolved atrazine and metolachlor from runoff. J. Environ. Qual 28:816821.Google Scholar
Misra, A. K., Baker, J. L., Mickelson, S. K., and Sang, H. 1996. Contributing area and concentration effects on herbicide removal by vegetative buffer strips. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng 39:21052111.Google Scholar
Patty, L., Real, B., and Gril, J. J. 1997. The use of grassed buffer strips to remove pesticides, nitrate and soluble phosphorus compounds from runoff water. Pest. Sci 49:243251.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P. J., Wall, G. R., Thurman, E. M., Eckhardt, D. A., and Vanhoesen, J. 1999. Metolachlor and its metabolites in tile drain and stream runoff in the canajohaire Greek watershed. Environ. Sci. Tech 33:35313537.Google Scholar
Rhode, W. A., Asmussen, L. E., Hauser, E. W., Wauchope, R. D., and Allison, H. D. 1980. Trifluralin movement in runoff from a small agricultural watershed. J. Environ. Qual 9:3742.Google Scholar
Schmitt, T. J., Dosskey, M. G., and Hoagland, K. D. 1999. Filter strip performance and processes for different vegetation, widths, and contaminants. J. Environ. Qual 28:14791489.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A., Lavy, T. L., and Daniel, T. C. 1997. Monitoring groundwater for pesticides at selected mixing/loading sites in Arkansas. Environ. Sci. Technol 31:283288.Google Scholar
Seybold, C., Mersie, W., and Delorem, D. 2001. Removal and degradation of atrazine and metolachlor by vegetative filter strips on clay loam soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal 32:723737.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. Pages 475490 in Sparks, D. L. ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3. Chemical Methods. SSSA Book Series 5. Madison, WI: SSSA.Google Scholar
Thurman, E. M., Goolsby, D. A., Aga, D. S., Pomes, M. L., and Meyer, M. T. 1996. Occurrence of alachlor and its sulfonated metabolite in rivers and reservoirs of the Midwestern United States: the importance of sulfonation in the transport of chloroacetanilide herbicides. Environ. Sci. Technol 30:569574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingle, C. H., Shaw, D. R., Boyette, M., and Murphy, G. P. 1998. Metolachlor and metribuzin losses in runoff as affected by width of vegetative filter strips. Weed Sci 46:475479.Google Scholar
Vellidis, G., Lowrance, R., Gay, P., and Wauchope, R. D. 2002. Herbicide transport in a restored riparian forest buffer system. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng 45/1:8997.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P. and Shaw, D. R. 1996. Impact of vegetative filter strips on herbicide loss in runoff from soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci 44:662671.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. E. III, Potter, K. N., and Hoffman, D. H. 2000. A device for simulating overland flow. J. Soil Water Cons 55:102104.Google Scholar