Skip to main content
Log in

A synoptic assessment for prioritizing wetland restoration efforts to optimize flood attenuation

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The placement of wetland restoration projects in a landscape to optimize the functional performance of wetlands on a regional scale is often overlooked. To address this problem, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Landscape Function Project developed the synoptic approach to assign restoration priority to landscape subunits according to selected functional criteria. The approach provides a flexible, ecologically-based framework for allocating limited restoration-resources and preserving valued wetland functions on a landscape scale. We conducted a synoptic assessment of the Prairie Pothole Region of the northcentral U.S. to demonstrate application of the method for our assessment criterion—the marginal decrease in total downstream flood volume per restoration dollar. A criterion is often not directly measurable but can be represented by an index composed of measurements on related variables. In a synoptic assessment, these measured variables, referred to as indicators, are limited to variables for which data are existing, accessible, and uniformly available for the entire region. We developed a conceptual model to guide the development of an index of the assessment criterion. We then ranked landscape subunits based on index values and mapped the ranks to show relative priority for restoration among landscape subunits. We conducted a series of analyses to justify selection of indicators and some of our assumptions. The approach offers multiple options for processing and displaying information for use by wetland managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abbruzzese, B. and S. G. Leibowitz. 1997. A synoptic approach for assessing cumulative impacts to wetlands. Environmental Management 21:457–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. H. 1993. The great flood of 1993. BioScience 43:732–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. 1981. Iowa’s wetlands. Proceedings Iowa Academy of Sciences 88:11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun, L. J., J. L. Richardson, J. W. Enz, and J. K. Larsen. 1981. Stream flow changes in the southern Red River Valley of North Dakota. North Dakota Farm Research Bulletin 38:11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. L. and H. P. Johnson. 1975. Hydrologic simulation of watersheds with artificial drainage. Water Resources Research 11:120–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cernohous, L. 1979. The role of wetlands in providing flood control benefits. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report, Bismarck, ND, USA.

  • Dahl, T. E. 1990. Wetland losses in the United States 1780’s to 1980’s. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, C. T. and H. P. Johnson. 1968. Hydraulic model of runoff from depressional areas, I: General considerations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 11:364–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, D. L. and N. S. Philippi. 1995. Flood reduction through wetland restoration: The upper Mississippi River basin as a case history (Commentary). Restoration Ecology 3:4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, A. 1988. Regulatory context for cumulative impact research. Environmental Management 12:715–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, D. E. 1988. Glaciated prairie wetland functions and values, A synthesis of the literature. U.S. Fish and Wildife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report 88(43).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, D. E. and R. L. Linder. 1986. Spring runoff retention in prairie pothole wetlands. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41:122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, J. B. and S. G. Leibowitz. 2000a. A general framework for prioritizing land units for ecological protection and restoration. Environmental Management. 25:23–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, J. B. and S. G. Leibowitz. 2000b. JSEM: A framework for identifying and evaluating indicators. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (in press).

  • Kantrud, H. A., G. L. Krapu, and G. A. Swanson. 1989. Prairie basin wetlands of the Dakotas: A community profile. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, USA. Biological Report 85(7.28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, K. M. 1973. A method for estimating volume and rate of runoff in small watersheds. U.S. Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA. SCS-TP-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloet, L. 1971. Effects of drainage on runoff and flooding within the Pembina River basin, North Dakota-Manitoba. Unpublished report, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Bismarck, ND, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolva, J. R. 1996. Effects of the great midwest flood of 1993 on wetlands. p. 97–98. In J. D. Fretwell, J. S. Williams, and P. J. Redman (eds.) National Water Summary on Wetland Resources. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2425.

  • Leibowitz, S. G., B. Abbruzzese, P. R. Adamus, L. E. Hughes, and J. T. Irish. 1992. A synoptic approach to cumulative impact assessment: a proposed methodology. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, USA. EPA/600/R-92/167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, S. G. and J. B. Hyman. 1999. Use of scale invariance in assessing the quality of judgement indicators. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 58:283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, S. G., C. Loehle, B. L. Li, and E. M. Preston. 2000 Modeling landscape functions and effects: A network approach. Ecological Modeling. (In press).

  • Linsley, R. K. and J. B. Franzini. 1972. Water Resources Engineering, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, G. E. 1974. The Prairie Pothole Region: a zone of environmental opportunity. Naturalist 25:2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, I. D. and C. L. Larson. 1979. Effects of drainage projects on surface runoff from small depressional watersheds in the North-Central Region. University of Minnesota Water Resources Research Center, St. Paul, MN, USA. Bulletin Number 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Climate Service and Soil Conservation Service (OCS/SCS). 1994. PRISM briefing packet and questionnaire: a description of the PRISM technique for spatially distributing observed precipitation. Climate Data Access Facility, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, E. M. and B. L. Bedford. 1988. Evaluating cumulative effects on wetland functions: A conceptual overview and generic framework. Environmental Management 12:565–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, W. J., A. Shalaby, and R. H. McCuen. 1981. Evaluation of methods for determining urban runoff curve numbers. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 24:1562–1566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, J. M. and M. T. Brown. 1992. Designing and protecting river corridors for wildlife. Rivers 3:14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scientific Assessment and Strategy Team (SAST). 1994. A blueprint for change, Part V: science for floodplain management into the 21st century. Interagency Floodplain Management Review Committee, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaber, P. R., F. P. Kapinos, and G. L. Knapp. 1984. State Hydrologic Unit Maps. U. S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 84-708.

  • Slack, R. B. and R. Welch. 1980. Soil Conservation Service runoff curve number estimates from Landsat data. Water Resources Bulletin 16:887–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1986. Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Sol Conservation Service. Engineering Division, Washington, DC, USA. Technical Release 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 1994. National Resources Inventory Training Modules. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Resources Inventory and Geographic Information Systems Division, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Commerce (USDC) 1993. Information Kit, Census of Agriculture. Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Commerce (USDC) 1994. 1992 Census of Agriculture-Volume 1: Geographic Area Series, State and County Data. Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1994. EPA Reach File Version 3.0, Alpha Release (RF3-Alpha): Technical Reference, First Edition. U.S. EPA, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. 1989. Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining, R. C., L. J. Brun, J. W. Enz and J. L. Richardson. 1983. An analysis of streamflow variability for three rivers in North Dakota. p. 50–51. In Fifth Conference on Hydrometerology. American Meterology Society, Boston, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D. M., M. Maizel, K. Chan, and J. Corson-Rikert. 1989. Polygon overlay to support point sample mapping: the National Resources Inventory. p. 384–390. In Proceedings, Auto-Carto 9. American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynne S. McAllister.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McAllister, L.S., Peniston, B.E., Leibowitz, S.G. et al. A synoptic assessment for prioritizing wetland restoration efforts to optimize flood attenuation. Wetlands 20, 70–83 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2000)020[0070:ASAFPW]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2000)020[0070:ASAFPW]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation